• reviews
  • cooling
  • Cooler Master MasterLiquid Pro 280 AIO Cooler Review
  • Cooler Master MasterLiquid Pro 280 AIO Cooler Review



    The Cooler Master MasterLiquid Pro 280 is designed for Intel Socket LGA2011 / 1156 / 1155 / 1150 and AMD processors. Here is an overview of the system and testing methodology.

    The System as it was Tested

    Asus P9X79 - X79 Chipset
    Intel Core i7 3960x (3.3Ghz) Hex Core 6 x 256KB L2 Cache 15MB L3 Cache
    Cooler Master MasterLiquid Pro 280 (Dual Fan)
    Cooler Master MasterLiquid Pro 240 (Dual Fan)

    The CPUID System Monitor was used to obtain and record system temperature data and being that this is a quad core processor we need something that will work across all of the cores at once.  For this task we're using a new version of Prime95 (p95v255a) that will allow you to spawn (n) instances to test with.

    Editors note: Even though the Windows 7 task manager reported 100% processor usage we could never attain a 100% of the rated heat output as documented by Intel (see below) when using Prime95 as a basis for that heat production. Knowing this we ran the stress test until the maximum temperature was attainted and stabilized.

    Other things to consider when judging software induced heat output.
    a) Clock throttling by the processor at high temperatures.
    b) Normal software isn't designed to produce maximum heat output.
    c) Variances of cooling temperature.
    d) Variances in CPU load.
    e) Inaccuracies in thermal diode readouts.
    Of course the list goes on..

    Our testing methodology is aimed to provide a real world look into this heatsink given the test system provided.

    Default Speed

    A C/W rating can quickly be calculated using this formula.

    C/W = (CPU temp - Ambient temp)/(Variance(%) * CPU Watts)
    Allowed variance for this test = 85%
    CPU Watts = 130W

    0.17 C/W = (42C - 23C)/(.85(130W))


    For this next test the CPU speed was cranked up to 4.6Ghz and the test was re-run. 

    To calculate a new C/W rating for this test we will need to factor in the increased processor wattage. The formula and constants for this are listed below.

    ocC/W = dCPU Watts * (ocMhz / dMhz) * (ocVcore / dVcore)2
    ocMhz = 4600
    dMhz = 3300
    ocVcore = 1.375
    dVcore = 1.2
    The variance still applies for our C/W calculation
    Allowed variance for this test = 85%
    CPU Watts = 238W

    0.17 C/W = (58C - 23C)/(.85(238W))

    Benchmark Conclusion

    In our heatsink and waterblock tests we don't really focus on overall load temperatures but rather how well the product can remove heat given a specified heat load. Since this is a real world testing method we need to take into consideration real world variables and estimate tolerances. This is why we normally only apply 85% of the total wattage output to our heat calculations.

    The resulting C/W number is used to rate how efficient a heatsink or waterblock is based on the given heat load. These numbers can be used to determine heat capacity, the larger the difference the less efficient the heatsink is. (aka not good for overclocking)

    One of the first things I noticed when testing the MasterLiquid Pro 280 is the size and density of the 280mm radiator.  It comes with a large number of water channels and an extremely dense set of cooling fins.  On the surface this appears to be an attempt to increase performance with additional surface area however it could be viewed as excessive.  Case in point, the MasterLiquid Pro 240 used as a reference posted a very similar (albeit higher) load temperature.  I expected the difference to be greater at around 5+ degrees.  The lack of this leads me to believe that while the larger radiator is more efficient the pump used is likely undersized for the 280mm radiator.

    Overall there is an increase in thermal capacity as indicated by the C/W number being identical between our default and overclocking tests.  However, the load temperatures are the same between the Pro 240 and Pro 280 which points to the pump moving the same amount of liquid and not increasing performance in the way you would expect. 

    Keep in mind these calculations are provided for demonstration purposes only and may not reflect the actual lab tested C/W rating, but we're pretty close.